RTI Appeal and Rejection
The Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 empowers Indian citizens to demand transparency from public authorities. However, not all RTI applications receive the information they seek. Many are rejected, ignored, or lead to appeals. Studying these trends offers deep insight into how well the RTI system is functioning—and where it may be falling short.
This article explores the growing trends in RTI appeals and rejections, what causes them, and how citizens can respond.
When a citizen files an RTI and:
Does not receive a reply within 30 days, or
Receives incomplete, misleading, or unjustly denied information,
They have the right to file:
A First Appeal: to the senior officer of the same public authority.
A Second Appeal: to the Central or State Information Commission (CIC or SIC).
A rising number of appeals and rejections may indicate systemic delays, non-compliance, or loopholes in how public authorities handle RTI requests.
Based on reports from the Central Information Commission (CIC) and independent studies like the Annual Report on the Performance of Information Commissions, here are key trends:
1. High Rejection Rates in Certain Ministries
Ministries like Defence, Home Affairs, and Finance have some of the highest RTI rejection rates.
A common reason cited is Section 8 exemptions, which allow denial based on national security, privacy, or internal deliberations.
Example: In 2022–23, over 30% of RTIs filed to the Ministry of Home Affairs were either rejected or received no response.
2. Delays Leading to Appeals
Before:
Many applicants do not receive any reply within the mandatory 30-day period.
This forces citizens to escalate to the first and second appeal stages, burdening the Information Commissions.
Data: As of mid-2023, over 3.2 lakh RTI appeals were pending across all State and Central Commissions, some dating back 2–3 years.
Salaries, allowances, and service conditions will be decided by the Central Government, not specified in the Act.
3. Vague or Improper Grounds for Rejection
» Public authorities often reject applications using generic phrases like:
"Not in public interest"
"Voluminous information"
"Not available with this department"
» In many cases, these grounds do not meet legal standards set by the RTI Act.
4. Backlog in Information Commissions
Many Information Commissions, especially at the state level, are understaffed or have vacant posts.
This leads to delays in hearing second appeals, with some applicants waiting years for a resolution.
Example: In states like Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Bihar, the waiting period for a second appeal hearing can range from 6 months to 2 years.
5. Increased Appeals from Marginalized Communities
RTI is increasingly being used by rural citizens, women, and marginalized groups.
Many appeals are related to ration cards, pensions, NREGA wages, and housing schemes.
However, rejection of these queries often goes unchallenged due to lack of awareness or legal aid.
| Reason | RTI Act Section | Description |
|---|---|---|
| National Security | Section 8(1)(a) | Denial citing public safety or defense |
| Personal Information | Section 8(1)(j) | When disclosure would violate privacy |
| Commercial Confidence | Section 8(1)(d) | When information affects business interests |
| Not Under Jurisdiction | Section 6(1) | If the application is sent to the wrong authority |
| Information Not Available | - | Often misused by departments to avoid sharing data |
If your RTI is rejected or ignored, here's what you can do:
» File a First Appeal
Within 30 days of receiving a rejection or no reply
Address it to the Appellate Authority in the same department
» File a Second Appeal
If the first appeal is also rejected or ignored
File it with the Central or State Information Commission
» Use CIC/SIC Websites
Many commissions have online appeal portals. You can also track the status of your appeal.
» Mention Legal Precedents
Quoting Supreme Court/High Court judgments in your appeal can strengthen your case.
Be clear and specific in your application.
Ask factual questions, not opinions or justifications.
Avoid asking multiple unrelated questions in one application.
Mention your interest in the information if it's related to public welfare.
Rising RTI rejections and appeals reflect deeper issues in public information systems—bureaucratic opacity, lack of training, and inadequate enforcement. But they also highlight that citizens are using RTI actively, pushing back when denied their right.
» To make RTI stronger:
Authorities must improve compliance and transparency.
Commissions must reduce backlogs and appoint more Information Commissioners.
Citizens must stay informed and persistent in their pursuit of truth.
" Not all RTI applications receive the information they seek. Many are rejected, ignored, or lead to appeals.
there are no comments yet on this blog.
Submit your comment in bellow form